Ever have one of those moments where you were felt
unprepared, but prepared at the same time? Well, if it exists I am pretty sure
that I experienced this on Wednesday when I presented my Problem Solving
Approach lesson for AEE 412 Lab. I chose to present a problem that challenged
the students to perform an evaluation to select a dairy cow to add to a neighbor's herd in replacement of the owner's top producer that had recently passed.
To be honest, I have grown up in the dairy industry, but I
have only given reasons for dairy cows less than a handful of times. I am
pretty rusty on my skills, so I really had to seek and search for sources of
helpful material to prepare me for this lab. Researching led me to recreating
and rewriting my lesson plan ideas for bell work, interest approach and
instruction, there were many times that I was determined that I should not be presenting on a subject that
I was not fully confident on. However, I already invested so much time and I
found this to be vital content to connect to other content in my unit;
therefore, I created and presented to the best of my ability. Below I have
highlighted things done well (Gems) and things not done well that need to be
improved (Opps) that I found after reviewing feedback from peers and watching
the video recording of my lesson.
Gems-
Honesty is the best policy. Many of my lab group members and virtual mentors shared how owning up to my issue of my broken hearing aids was a good move. Not only did it show that I was being honest, but it allowed me to set the stage for expectations for the students at the beginning of the lesson.
Also, my lab group shared how my enthusiasm was very high at the beginning, but did fade a
little during the lesson. Yet, the enthusiasm at the beginning was able to captivate my lab group’s
attention and made them want to learn.
Lastly, my lab group really enjoyed
having the ability to create the objectives, so they knew how to solve the
problem from content they previously learned.
Opps –
Classroom management was a little rough. However this was my
fault. My students were decently behaved, but I did not act upon the minor
things that should have been taken care of. My hearing impairment was to blame,
but I should have positioned myself around my lab group members to ensure clear
communication was taking place to ensure good behavior.
Also, I felt that I relied too much on the PowerPoint and
presenting review information. This took up a chunk of time, which lost engagement
of my lab group. It was suggested that instead of having students review and
then choose cow, I should make the students choose the cow, and then have them
develop reasoning through review. I felt that this was a great suggestion that
I want to try out.
It is evident I still have things to work on, but I have
grown in areas of weakness through practice and research. I always critique
myself hard, and point out the negative more than the positive (as you can see
above). I believe in growth, and pointing out things to improve on is always helpful to remind
myself that I can do better. In addition, we are reminded that these labs are not a formative
assessment, rather a self-assessment that allows us to prepare for our student teaching experience.
Halee, what are some other delivery techniques that you could have used to share the relevant information about the criteria for evaluating dairy cattle? Allowing your students to design objectives helps give them a sense of ownership and investment in what they are learning. I commend your honesty about sharing your hearing impairment.
ReplyDelete